Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End -- Scott's Review
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

Note: This review was penned by an unapologetic Pirates of the Caribbean lunatic. (I expected the first movie to STINK, and I ended up adoring the thing. I expected Part 2 to be a tired rehash, and it was anything but.) While that certainly doesn't mean I walked into the flick INTENT on giving it a good review, the simple truth is that these movies speak directly to the ravenous 12-year-old movie geek who (fortunately) still holds residence inside my soul. The flick is far from perfect, indeed it's bottom-heavy and swollen to bursting with wriggling plot threads, but damn if I didn't have a good time tagging along on this third adventure with all my old Pirates pals. Having said that, let's move on...
Sometimes the big-time franchise makers are damned if they do and damned if they don't: Churn out a skimpy "Part 3" that just rehashes what was offered in Parts 1 & 2 and you've got something vaguely entertaining but clearly inferior like Shrek the Third. Try too hard to jam too many arbitrary plot threads and flimsy characters into your third entry and you're stuck with a lurching behemoth like Spider-Man 3. And then you have the middle ground: The sprawling, gorgeous and massive adventure epic Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, which while far from a flawless film, aims to stay faithful to its predecessors while still upping the ante (a lot) with a boat-load of new plot developments, characters and surprisingly nifty subtext. Yep, this particular popcorn movie runs almost three full hours, but if producer Jerry Bruckheimer and director Gore Verbinski had produced a quick-buck 92-minute third chapter, then the complaints would be legion. You can't win. Except at the box office, obviously.
As it stands: Yes, Pirates 3 has a few more plot-threads than it really needs. And yes, it's probably a bit longer (168 minutes) than it really needs to be -- but the bottom line is this: Once again, the Pirates series delivers the goods. In style and color, in character and adventure, in wit and weirdness ... this movie delivers. I'll make it even simpler: If you enjoyed Part 1 but thought Part 2 was over-plotted, overlong and over-kinetic, then you'll feel the exact same way about Part 3. As an outspoken and very geeky fan of the first two chapters, however, I was pretty much dazzled by what World's End has to offer, and I'm not just talking about the action, the effects and the mayhem. And if the flick's got just a little too much fat on the bones, oh well. A bit too much is always better than not enough, if it's me you're asking.
When we last saw Will Turner and Lizzy Swann, they were coming to grips with the fact that the untrustworthy yet hilarious Captain Jack Sparrow had been swallowed by a massive sea creature. Tough way to end a second chapter, but more than juicy enough to keep the moviegoers wondering how the writers would scrawl their way out of this mess. As Part 3 opens, we join Will, Elizabeth and most of the colorful Black Pearl crew as they attempt to steal some vital information from the devious pirate Sao Feng. With the opening salvo of high-octane lunacy out of the way, we get down to story number one: How to rescue Jack Sparrow from the arid netherworld that is Davy Jones' Locker. (The "locker" is like something out of a Terry Gilliam flick, really.)
Once that's finished with, just about every character from all three films gets their own subplot, motivation and screen time: Will Turner wants to rescue his father from the clutches of Jones, squid-faced Davy Jones is compelled to do the unholy bidding of the evil Lord Beckett, creepy fortune teller Tia Dalma must put an end to a old curse, the resurrected Barbossa wants his ship back, poor Norrington is still looking for some redemption ... Whew. Who knew the Pirates of the Caribbean series would turn into such an entertainingly convoluted soap opera? The first 2/3rds of At World's End are jam-packed with more plot twists, character developments, back-stabbings and revelations than an entire season of Desperate Housewives. And, provided you're already invested in the series, just about all of the material is good, goofy fun.
The most common gripe about the flick will be the blather. Just about every character onscreen gets to deliver huge speeches, explain current plot threads in blatantly expositional chunks, and then head off to betray everyone they just hung out with for an hour. There are certain points in the movie where you're forced to wonder why the characters even talk to each other at all; obviously nobody in this movie can trust anyone. But what some see as indulgent and unnecessary plot meanderings I choose to enjoy as a soap opera mixed with the world's coolest video game. It's interesting when characters screw each other over, worry about their own asses, and then (maybe) step up to be noble when the time calls for it.
And if you get too confused, here's a simple roadmap:
1. Beckett is using Davy Jones to kill as many pirates as he can.
2. The surviving pirates hatch a plan to re-awaken an ancient sea goddess in order to protect themselves.
3. Will wants to marry Liz and save his dad from a waterlogged purgatory.
4. Squidface Jones is still suffering from a sort of seasick lovesickness. ('Nuff said.)
5. Captain Jack Sparrow is worried about his own keester and very little else.
As in the last two films, the cast is photogenic, amusing and generally solid across the board. Yeah, Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley's characters are still a little bland, but there's more than enough color here to deliver a few diversions. (The long-discussed Keith Richards cameo is a gimmick, but a briefly funny one.) As in the second chapter, it's the supporting characters who keep the ship afloat: Kevin McNally as Jack's right-hand man, Mackenzie Crook and Lee Arenberg as the Abbott & Costello of the unwashed pirate set, Naomie Harris as a borderline indecipherable fortune teller, Chow Yun-Fat as a devious pirate captain forced to reach an accord with the ever-scheming Sparrow, etc. (One only wishes that series regulars Jonathan Pryce and Jack Davenport had been given a little more to do. In a movie this long, the firmly established characters shouldn't get shunted into the background, but that's pretty much what happens here.) But the true standout of At World's End is Mr. Geoffrey Rush, whose snarling comments and boisterous energy were sorely missed in Dead Man's Chest. Rush and Depp make a fantastic team whenever the pair share the screen.
To delve into the sterling cinematography, the seriously stunning set design, the outrageous action scenes or the eye-tickling special effects would be pointless and redundant: You've already seen Pirates 2, and this one was shot at the same time by the same team. Sure, Pirates 3 is longer than it needs to be, and it's more than a little circuitous with all its overlapping story threads, subplots, character motivations and ceaseless back-stabbings ... but I don't think the fans will mind all that much. When you order an extra-large pizza with "everything," it damn well better be delivered with everything. To close this silly analogy: At World's End is that pizza. It gives you everything you want from a Pirates of the Caribbean movie, and if doles out just a few too many toppings and a couple of 'em spill off the plate, well, that seems like a pretty wacky thing to complain about.
(Fair warning to the parents out there: At World's End is arguably the most violent movie ever released under the Disney banner. It's actually quite dark in some places, too. Just letting you know.)










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5-24-2007 @ 9:27AM
brian said...
This review felt like one long attempt to try really hard to let us know the movie is fat, bloated, over-long, talkie, slow, lumbering and seriously convoluted but that you hope we really, really like it because you're such a fan. Is that objective? This movie will make tons of money whether anyone likes it or not. So why try so hard? Just tell us what was seriously wrong, I mean, the movie might not really be any good, but this is less a review than a fanboys plea to just enjoy a series they like very much. Whatever. What do I know. This summer, though, will go down as the most blockbusterest (I know that isn't a word) but I believe it will also go down as the worst in terms of quality. But what do I know.
Anyhow, I come to this site for reviews and stories and objective criticisms...leave the fanboy stuff to AICN. Please.
Reply
7-26-2007 @ 11:18AM
JimRM said...
I don't know, brian, he states in the first paragraph he's a fan, so I think everything he writes should be read with that in mind. If you are a fan, you will probably see the movie regardless of the reviews, good or bad. If you didn't like POTC2, and this is more of the same (as the reviewer indicates) then you probably won't see it. His review told me everything I need to know, and suspected already, about POTC3. And it didn't change my mind on whether or not I'm going to see it (I'm not, btw).
Reply
5-24-2007 @ 11:05AM
Tracy said...
I saw the movie last Monday and its fantastic. If you have a problem with the pirates films then don't see it. If you want to have fun with Captain Jack and get more bang for your buck, this is the film for you.
Reply
5-24-2007 @ 11:25AM
Barbs said...
Brian
Quite clearly you are quite the opposite to Scott.. You will condemn Pirates 3 no matter what. How can you say something as lame as 'but I believe it will also go down as the worst in terms of quality' when you clearly haven’t seen the movie and then still try take the moral high ground with 'Anyhow, I come to this site for reviews and stories and objective criticisms...'? Obviously you are some self absorbed idiot!
Get over yourself Dude!
Reply
5-24-2007 @ 2:35PM
Kevin said...
The reason that I didn't like POTC 2 wasn't because I thought it was overlong, overplotted, or overanythinged. I just didn't feel like it had the same magic and fun that the first one did. Anyone else agree with me on this? The first one was whimsical and light, and was having fun at all times. The second one was much darker and more disturbing, and I found myself more frequently grimacing than grinning.
Reply
5-24-2007 @ 5:34PM
Cath said...
I thought the first one was made tolerable only by the presence of Depp and his novel performance. The second one seemed to have less Depp, less coherence, less concern for anything other than visual excess, less characterization and still waaaaay too long. The actors also seemed tired and not all that committed to the whisper-thin story line and overdone effects. The scathing reviews the third has been receiving in the trades seem to indicate that this installment will be of a piece. I frankly don't understand the contempt for a coherent story that permeates the action genre of late. These films seem more and more like video games and less like movies all the time. Nor can I imagine shelling out ten bucks for yet another loud borefest, Depp notwithstanding.
Reply
5-24-2007 @ 6:55PM
Candice said...
Just watched it. And I must say, it's awesome - completely lived up to my expectations. It's long, but what the heck, I'm used to watching 3 hour plus Bollywood films.
To all fans, it's way brilliant.
To all POTC detractors, sucks to be you!
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 12:30AM
Dahlia said...
I loved the movie it was the best yet.. i can't wait for number four..it tied up all lose ends ( but added a few new ones for the next movie) I will see it again ..I am a huge fan of the movies and this was the frosting i needed on the cake.. i am very pleased with how everything turned out.
Reply
5-25-2007 @ 1:57PM
JAIME said...
I loved the first 2 movies but I have to say that the 3rd had a little too much going on. I was very disappointed in the end. It wasn't what I expected at all. I thought Jack would be a better captain for the flying dutchman ( since he did want immortality and he did not have a love interest), and why did Will have to die only to be raised as the new captain of the dutchman? That wasn't fair that Elizabeth has to be alone on some island not able to see her husband for 10 years at a time.
What happened to CALYPSO and Davy Jones? Did they end up together? and did that last 30 seconds after the credits showing Elizabeth and her child ( Will's son) mean that that is the end of the "PIRATE" legacy? I feel cheated out of a good Finale. And I love Johnny Depp, but whats up with his lunatic ranting and delusional scenes? I was very sadly disapointed. I really was hoping this would be my favorite movie ever. It wasn't. The only thing I can say I loved was the the first hour and a half of special effects ( going down the waterfall, the boat rocking and capsizing)but thats about it.
Reply
5-25-2007 @ 9:06AM
gail said...
I saw the movie last night. I have mixed feelings about the movie. I think I expected more or something different. I expected it to start exactly where it left off...."What would you do? Would you go to the ends of the earth?" I feel I missed a little part of the movie there.
It did have you guessing, "What is going to happen next?" Only a couple of laughs.
Elizabeth is like the "kiss of death" literally! All the men love her and want her. You just love to hate Beckkett, & poor Norrington. I liked all the characters!
It was long and some of the parts could have been shortned.I will see the movie again and I will buy it to have the full series.
I did like that the trilogy ended where the first one began. But is it really the end? Is the last time we will see Capt. Jack Sparrow?
Gail
Reply
5-25-2007 @ 9:32AM
Jez said...
mmm i really enjoyed this movie. it was so satisfying.
Reply
5-25-2007 @ 11:01PM
Susan Gunelius (MarketingBlurb.com) said...
Scott, thanks for the great review. I can't wait to see this movie! Like you, I love the first two movies from the Pirates trilogy and I've been anxiously awaiting the release of Dead Man's Chest. I'm glad it will be nearly three hours long! I referenced your review in my blog at:
http://www.marketingblurb.com/2007/05/will_pirates_of_the_caribbean.html
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 12:59AM
isela said...
I really enjoyed all three shows. Granted the third is a little long, but hey it was entertaining. I did miss staying after the credits but thanks to Jamie now I know what I missed, I still would have liked to see this last scene though.
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 5:09PM
Ica said...
I saw the movie today and I actually really liked it. It was not good in the same way as the first one was, but I still enjoyed it. I didn't even think it was too long, even though nothing happened. I must admit that I hate action sequences, but they were ok in this one. I really hope they would make a fourth one, with less action. Is there really 30s of Elizabeth with a child after the credits? If there is I missed it.
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 3:36PM
jotjot said...
The first movie was great! Unexpectedly so! The second sucked, don't let the first movie's magic lift that one to life. If you saw the second movie first, you would have thought it was crap. The third is more crappier! And I'm seriously wondering whether Disney paid you off to say otherwise!
Reply
5-26-2007 @ 4:58PM
Kristen said...
Fan of the wacky pirates? You'll see the movie and come away enjoying it. I agree with this review, it's not the only good review out there; check out the Chicago Tribune...
It has something for everyone and something everyone might not sit well with. That's a fairly good creative acheivement. It wraps up loose ends and paves out new ones. The map, Depp's Duldroms, the Calypso/Davey Jones character, and sea battles are in step with the kind of story telling that would come out of the story's time period. Elizabeth plays a true pirate:She's the femme fatale they all must die for! Get It?
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 1:41AM
Greg said...
Saw it last night. Yawn. I mean, I've already seen it in the first two. It was tiresome, dragging, uncreative and only had about three areas which created an outloud chuckle from an audiance which were "veteran" pirate fans. I love these charactors but with all the money this was going to rake in, couldn't they had hired some writers. As it turned out, the biggest pirates are Disney and Jerry Bruckheimer for lifting your money at the box office.
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 12:25AM
Sallie said...
I just saw the movie for the second time. I will admit that the first one is still my favorite, but the story arc over this movie and DMC was certainly entertaining. After the first time I saw AWE, I was a little angry with the way they left things between Liz and Will--mistakenly under the impression that Will would potentially only get to see his child 6 times in the child's lifetime (if the child lived to be 60). BUT apparently, there was a crucial (at least to me) line of dialogue that the writers said was cut from the final version that said that if the cursed's lover remained faithful for the 10 years he was away, the curse would be broken. So now I can rest easy. Thankfully! This might not have bothered anyone else, but I just thought I would share the knowledge!
Reply
5-27-2007 @ 1:30PM
LOVAUSSEA said...
This movie was AMAZING in my opinion. Any movie that is comical, witty, suspensful, tear jerking, surprising, and even makes the viewer want to jump into the screen and strangle a character at times, all in one viewing, is a DAMN good movie. One worth seeing over & over. The fact that it is long, makes me want to watch the movie more than once, twice, three times. There's got to be so many lines, meanings, sights that I missed! At first, I hated the ending, I had huge croc tears rolling down my face. But then I saw the clip after the credits. It gave me some hope. They are definitely coming out with a 4th. I'll be devestated if the didnt.
Reply
5-28-2007 @ 2:32PM
andydreamseeker said...
Glad that it ended or has it?
Check out my review here:
http://andydreamseeker.blogspot.com/2007/05/movie-review-pirates-of-caribbean-at.html
Reply